ML Archiv: Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!

Subject:	Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!
From:	DaEyeGuy@xxxxxxx
Date:	Sun, 16 Sep 2001 08:33:52 EDT

The Esif has a history where you can look up the intro date on every 
camera...it lists the OM2n as 1979.

http://www.taiga.ca/~esif/om-sif/camhistory/camhistory.htm


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, (continued) Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Tris Schuler [OM] Re: Pete Hamill column--NY Daily News, Tris Schuler Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Charles Loeven Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, DaEyeGuy Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Tom Scales Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Mickey Trageser Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Hans van Veluwen Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Bill Stanke Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Chris Barker Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Larry Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, DaEyeGuy <= Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Morgan Sparks Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Henrik Dahl Re: Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Wayne Harridge Re: Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Tris Schuler Re: Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Henrik Dahl Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Ray Moth Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Morgan Sparks

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, DaEyeGuy
Next by Date:	[OM] silverfast vs vuescan, Alan
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Larry
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Morgan Sparks
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]