ML Archiv: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!

Subject:	[OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!
From:	"jlamadoo, home account" <jlamadoo@xxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 16 Sep 2001 02:07:24 -0400

Andrew,
Thanks for you advice on using a QF310, apparently in place of a T32, but
the T32 should work perfectly with the OM-2.  Where are you and Susan
getting this idea that the 2 and the T32 are incompatible?

Andrew added:
Quickflash QF310.



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, (continued) Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, John Hermanson Re: Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Bill Stanke Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, DaEyeGuy [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Larry Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Garth Wood Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Charles Loeven [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account <= Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, andrew fildes Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account RE: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Jim Couch Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Garth Wood Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Larry Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, DaEyeGuy Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Tom Scales

Previous by Date:	[OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account
Previous by Thread:	[OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, andrew fildes
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]