I don't mean to try and get someone else to make my purchasing
decisions. But it does seem like the folks on this list are likely to have
opinions about this so ...
I've been looking around on e-bay and elsewhere and here are a few of the
choices:
From E-Bay
-----------------
Zuiko 85-250mm f5 -- currently $153.50 looks kinda large and heavy
NEW OLYMPUS ZUIKO 70-210mm f4.5-5.6 LENS -- $134.50
New Vivitar 70-210 mm f4.5-5.6 -- $99.00
Some new prices from HotBuysElectronics.com
------------------------------
Tamron 70-210mm f4-5.6 -- $164.98
Vivitar 28-210mm f/3.5?5.6 -- $149.98 light and small, takes a funky
looking adapter to Oly mount
Tokina SZ-X MF 28-200 f/3.5-5.3 -- $199.98 a bit pricey and heavy
I'd say out of this field the Zuiko 70-210 is looking pretty good. I
wonder if anyone has any strong positive or negative things to say about
any of these lenses. Note that I have ignored the Phoenix 75-300 as
looking too cheap. There are also some lovely looking Tamrons and Tokinas
that are a bit too expensive.
I don't really understand the difference between the fixed and variable
f-stop spec's. Or rather, I can imagine that the better lenses work harder
to provide the fixed settings. But could someone explain this to me and
tell me why I should care?
Still wondering what sort of film y'all would recommend for shooting
Reno. And like the advice about never using zooms (seriously, I appreciate
the opinions) I expect someone to tell me that slide film is the only real
option. I expect nonetheless to shoot print film both for ease of showing
my friends a few prints, and because I only have a flatbed scanner. I
might well get all my stuff scanned by the processor, however, so it could
be worth someone's time to make the case for slides.
Thanks in advance,
DMcG
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|