Hi David,
I have two Zuiko 65-200 f/4 lenses and since I never use either, I could
part with one in good conscience. One of them is in mint condition, it looks
like its new. It is beautiful! If you buy it I guarantee you will agree.
I also have an extra 85-250mm f/5 and a 35-105mm Zuiko that I could also
sell, if you or any one, for that matter, are interested. I find the 85-250
(on a tripod) to produce outstanding images. If you are interested please
let me know. Thanks!
R Howard
----- Original Message -----
From: David McGriffy <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Zoom/Film choices for Reno
> hmmmm ... I thought I sent a response to this last night, but I never got
> it. Too many ISPs, too many mail clients on too many different
> computers. Anyway, sorry if this is a dup.
>
> I've received a lot of good feedback on and off list about lens choices
and
> a pattern has emerged. No one likes the new Olympus (rebadged Cosina),
but
> everyone likes the Zuiko 65-200 f4. Looking around the web some more, I
> see some good and bad reviews of this lens, but it often seems to be the
> one zoom that people hold on to. I also found a few for sale at prices
> from $179 to $239. The low price is from www.camera-depot.com. Should I
> jump on this deal?
>
> Tom, I repeat, you are very kind and trusting to offer the loan of your
> good lenses, but the more good things I hear about the 65-200, the less I
> want to take your example to Reno with me. Jumping on and off busses,
> running across the pits, the heat/cold/rain, the fine desert dust, the
> mustard from the bad burgers, etc. It's hard on me, though I guess the
> 5000 foot altitude probably doesn't affect the gear as much as it does
> me. Now a quick test over the next few days could be fun, especially
since
> it would be an excuse to meet.
>
> Thanks all,
> DMcG
>
> At 08:57 PM 8/21/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> >David,
> >
> >Can't help on the non-Zuikos, but you do NOT want the Zuiko 70-210. It
is
> >NOT made by Olympus. Olympus has two lenses made by Cosina -- the 70-210
> >and the 35-70/3.5-4.8 (notice the 4.8). They are both, well, junk.
> >
> >My offer to try out the Zuikos is still open. Borrow'em this weekend if
you
> >want.
> >
> >Tom
> >
> >I don't mean to try and get someone else to make my purchasing
> >decisions. But it does seem like the folks on this list are likely to
have
> >opinions about this so ...
> >
> >I've been looking around on e-bay and elsewhere and here are a few of the
> >choices:
> >
> > From E-Bay
> >-----------------
> >Zuiko 85-250mm f5 -- currently $153.50 looks kinda large and heavy
> >NEW OLYMPUS ZUIKO 70-210mm f4.5-5.6 LENS -- $134.50
> >New Vivitar 70-210 mm f4.5-5.6 -- $99.00
> >
> >Some new prices from HotBuysElectronics.com
> >------------------------------
> >Tamron 70-210mm f4-5.6 -- $164.98
> >Vivitar 28-210mm f/3.5-5.6 -- $149.98 light and small, takes a funky
> >looking adapter to Oly mount
> >Tokina SZ-X MF 28-200 f/3.5-5.3 -- $199.98 a bit pricey and heavy
> >
> >I'd say out of this field the Zuiko 70-210 is looking pretty good. I
> >wonder if anyone has any strong positive or negative things to say about
> >any of these lenses. Note that I have ignored the Phoenix 75-300 as
> >looking too cheap. There are also some lovely looking Tamrons and
Tokinas
> >that are a bit too expensive.
> >
> >I don't really understand the difference between the fixed and variable
> >f-stop spec's. Or rather, I can imagine that the better lenses work
harder
> >to provide the fixed settings. But could someone explain this to me and
> >tell me why I should care?
> >
> >Still wondering what sort of film y'all would recommend for shooting
> >Reno. And like the advice about never using zooms (seriously, I
appreciate
> >the opinions) I expect someone to tell me that slide film is the only
real
> >option. I expect nonetheless to shoot print film both for ease of
showing
> >my friends a few prints, and because I only have a flatbed scanner. I
> >might well get all my stuff scanned by the processor, however, so it
could
> >be worth someone's time to make the case for slides.
> >
> >Thanks in advance,
> >DMcG
> >
> >
> >< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> >< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> >< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> >
> >
> >
> >< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> >< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> >< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|