Thanks chris! I have a vivitar 70-210/3.5 it's just damn heavy! LOL..
I'll give that a shot.
-Dan
Chris Charlton wrote:
>
> Well the basic rule is, that "what you see is what you
> get" look through the viewfinder and imagine that as
> the picture, sometimes developers clip portions of the
> photo out (the edges) so you may lose a little on the
> prints. Generally you can't take pictures of animals
> etc (especially timid ones) unless you have a
> telephoto, I'd say a minimum of 135mm before they get
> spooked and fly/crawl/run/slide away.
>
> Chris
>
> --- Dan <voseds@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > I was taking
> pictures with my OM10 and 50/1.8
> > yesterday of humming birds, went
> > and got them developed today, but the pictures are
> > bad.. you can't see the birds
> > at all.. I wasn't that far away, i dont think.. my
> > question is what are some
> > optimal distances you should be at when using a
> > 50/1.8? thanks!
> >
> > -Dan *new to photography*
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing
> > List >
> > < For questions,
> > mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page:
> > http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> >
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
> or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|