Subject: | Re: [OM] OM-2n (Was: Tom Scales - Random observations about myphoto trek.) |
---|---|
From: | "Bachofen" <mbachofen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:36:44 -0500 |
>. . . having a bulky hot shoe that I NEVER use on top of >my OM-2 and OM-1. So, you chose to have a camera without the ability to have flash, even at a synch of 60. Some of us don't. It's still poor engineering given that they can't hold adequate flashes. I believe it is simple, if the removeable/replaceable shoe was durable it would be fine. They don't last. That's the problem. M.E.Bachofen < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 180/2.8 vs. Vivitar 200/3.5, Bernard Frangoulis |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Abuse! (was Re: [OM] Moderator on List), Tom Scales |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-2n (Was: Tom Scales - Random observations about myphoto trek.), Jim Couch |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-2n (Was: Tom Scales - Random observations about myphoto trek.), John A. Lind |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |