Subject: | RE: [OM] 18mm vs 16mm |
---|---|
From: | "gries" <gries@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:53:23 -0500 |
Go with the 18. It is unique because of the perfect rectiliniarity of the image across the frame. I use it mostly for interior shots, but with skill it can be used in other situations. -bob\ <snip> The real purpose of my question is to decide whether to go for the 16 or 18 when the disease/addiciton hits again... ;-). < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Help! Can't get scanner installed, John Pendley |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Help! Can't get scanner installed, DaEyeGuy |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] 18mm vs 16mm, Chris Barker |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 18mm vs 16mm, Wayne S |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |