Thanks a lot Skip, Bob, Walt and Jim
The information was just what I needed. I think that I have what I
need already ... there, how's that for a cured Zuik? :>).
Chris
At 15:52 -0400 16/08/01, Skip Williams wrote:
(I'm going to say-as-I-do, for maximum CYA here)
I'd get the 16/3.5 if you have the 21/3.5 and forego the 18/3.5.
Why? I like to take immersive panoramas, and the images from the
16/3.5 are much easier to correct for stitching. If you REALLY need
the extra 8 degrees of FOV, buying the 18/3.5 is a pretty expensive
way to get it. You could also shoot pictures with the 16 and unwrap
the fisheye effect digitally to get about the same FOV as an 18.
...
Just my 2 cents though. Your milage may vary.
Skip
--
___________
???>-}
C M I Barker
Gamlingay, Cambridgeshire, Great Britain
mailto:imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:chris_barker@xxxxxxxxx
YaC tel: +44 (0)7092 251126
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|