Subject: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 85 f2 vs Zuiko 90 f2 Macro |
---|---|
From: | Mike <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:22:34 -0700 |
I tried the extension tubes on the 85/2 and thought it worked pretty well especially the 14mm. So now I'm thinking i don't really need the 90/2. I haven't actually used the 90/2 but the size is similar to the 35-70/4 and heavier which is too big for me. Mike -- To reply, return email address should end in .net not .com < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] OM2S only does 1/60th, sort of?, Daniel J. Mitchell |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Zuikoholicism in remission, Doggre |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 85 f2 vs Zuiko 90 f2 Macro, Jim Couch |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 85 f2 vs Zuiko 90 f2 Macro, Jim Couch |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |