You need immediate treatment and re-infection with Zuioholic virus.
Repeat after me: "I need the 90/2. I must have the 90/2. I can't live
without the 90/2. It has to make better pictures, it's more expensive. I
will buy one. I will buy one soon. I will buy one tomorrow. I will buy
one today. I will buy one now!"
There, don't you feel better? Now what were you saying about "So now I'm
thinking i don't really need the 90/2"? I'm sure you mis-typed.
:-))
Skip
****** I M P O R T A N T R E P L Y I N F O ************
Please adddress ALL offlist messages to skipwilliams@xxxxxxxxx
This hotmail.com email address is ONLY used for this mailing list
subscription and I will probably not notice any private messages addressed
here.
***********************************************************
From: Mike <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: Olympus-Digest <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [OM] Zuiko 85 f2 vs Zuiko 90 f2 Macro
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:22:34 -0700
I tried the extension tubes on the 85/2 and thought it worked pretty
well especially the 14mm. So now I'm thinking i don't really need the
90/2. I haven't actually used the 90/2 but the size is similar to the
35-70/4 and heavier which is too big for me.
Mike
--
To reply, return email address should end in .net not .com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|