> I always thought that it must distort the picture a bit, having one
> side exposed later than the other, but I suppose it doesn't
> matter much, except for _very_ fast-moving objects.
Hm, perhaps I should do some math and work out when it really _does_
matter..
Say I'm taking a photo of a car driving past at 80mph, but let's do this in
metric for sanity's sake, so call it 120kph, near enough. And imagine I have
the camera aligned vertically, so it'll be moving perpendicular to the
motion of the shutter.
Imagine I'm 20m away from it; how far across the field of view does it move
in 1/60th of a second? Bit of trig, and it'll move 16 degrees through the
field of view during that time. Assume I'm using a 50mm lens, angle-of-view
there is 47 degrees, so it'll smear across roughly 1/3 of the image. Now,
assume something more realistic; 200mm lens = 12 degree angle of view, and
I'm 100m away, same speed. Now it covers 10f the image, which is still a
bit iffy, but a lot more manageable.
I guess what this does tell me is that the shots I took on the weekend
should come out just fine, given that nobody was moving anything like that
fast.
-- dan
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|