Subject: | Re: [OM] OM2000 in Retrospect vs. OM-2S, etc? |
---|---|
From: | The Butler Family <butlerfamly@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 12 Aug 2001 21:36:00 -0700 |
Bill Barber wrote: Amen to brother Ken N's assessment on the OM 2S. Here Here! I remember Ken's posts of a few years ago. It was due to his and Gary's Reese and Schloss' recommendations that I finally bought a 2s about two years ago. Since then it has had better than 100 rolls through it with a fair amount of flash use and it is only on its third set of batteries. This means of course I will now have to replace them the next time I try to use it, but so be it. The batteries it uses are very cheap compared to the CR123's my wife's P&S uses about five time as fast. My only fear is that, by the time it does die their true value will be realized and I will need to take out a second on my house to replace it. Mike Butler Dublin, California < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Baby Pictures, Doggre |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] OM2S with T32 Flash #3, DBellamy2k |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM2000 in Retrospect vs. OM-2S, etc?, DBellamy2k |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] OM2000 in Retrospect vs. OM-2S, etc?, Daniel J. Mitchell |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |