Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM2000 in Retrospect vs. OM-2S, etc?

Subject: Re: [OM] OM2000 in Retrospect vs. OM-2S, etc?
From: The Butler Family <butlerfamly@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 21:36:00 -0700
Bill Barber wrote:  Amen to brother Ken N's assessment on the OM 2S.

Here Here!

    I remember Ken's posts of a few years ago.  It was due to his and
Gary's Reese and Schloss' recommendations that I finally bought a 2s
about two years ago.  Since then it has had better than 100 rolls
through it with a fair amount of flash use and it is only on its third
set of batteries.  This means of course I will now have to replace them
the next time I try to use it, but so be it.  The batteries it uses are
very cheap compared to the CR123's my wife's P&S uses about five time as
fast.
    My only fear is that, by the time it does die their true value will
be realized and I will need to take out a second on my house to replace
it.

Mike Butler
Dublin, California



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz