Hi,
> Or maybe borrow a 35-80/2.8 for a while and the 3.6 will seem so
> light and compact. :-)
I think so, yes. But do you think there is someone who will borrow me a
38-80/2.8? (Anybody here? ;-)
> Seriously. The 3.6 size and weight are greatly exaggerated. It is
> bigger than the 3.5-4.5 but it is 150 grams lighter and 3 mm longer
> than the 90/2 which some people love to carry around. It is lighter
> than the 100/2, any of the long zooms or long telephotos. Many people
> think that 3.6 photos have a special "look" to them which is really
> nice.
Now that's an interesting point. Do other list members have made experiences
with this special "look"?
Regards,
Bernd
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|