If quality of lens is not important, I will buy a Tamron 28-300 and shooting
very happily. Why brother will that many Zuiko zooms and primes. I already
mentioned lenses come the last, not even second. But I'm sure I like to see
a picture will better details and nicer color.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "LACEY.B" <LACEY.B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 11:31 PM
Subject: RE: [OM] another philosophical question about the 135
> The art of having the eye for the scene and the catching the moment can be
> more important than having an all singing all dancing expensive top of the
> range lenses.
> My wife took a shot from the roof of the Musee d'Orsey in Paris at
twilight
> and it is perfect, but it was taken with a disposable camera, as her pride
> an joy SLR decided to give up the ghost two days into the holiday.
>
> So timing and having the eye is what comes first, the equipment and the
> technology comes second
>
>
>
> Brian Lacey
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|