Subject: | Re: [OM] another philosophical question about the 135 |
---|---|
From: | Tris Schuler <tristanjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 27 Jul 2001 07:56:15 -0700 |
Yes, except I get off lots of lousy shots, and I've as many frames in my
past as anyone. What I'm trying to say is talent figures in, too. <g>
Tris At 10:22 AM 7/27/01 -0400, you wrote: In a message dated 7/27/01 6:23:18 AM Pacific Daylight Time, tristanjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:But there's something to be said for going out in a relaxed frame of mind there and just taking the damned pictures, too.Once again I have to say, "what he said"! While it is useful to know the relative performance of lenses that we use, the "relative" performance of the photographer is far more important and you don't get good unless you practice, practice, practice! Dave Dougherty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Photographing People, Reynolds Paul (NAP) |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] another philosophical question about the 135, C.H.Ling |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] another philosophical question about the 135, DAVDOU9211 |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] another philosophical question about the 135, LACEY.B |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |