Subject: | Re: [OM] another philosophical question about the 135 |
---|---|
From: | "John A. Lind" <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 26 Jul 2001 22:45:06 +0000 |
At 01:14 7/27/01, C.H. Ling wrote: No! a true Zuikoholic should have all... 85/2, 90/2, 100/2, 135/2.8, 135/3.5, I have them all :-) C.H.Ling The question, then: Are you _using_ them all? -- John < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] 16mm f/3.5 versions. L39(UV) and NEUTRAL filter positions., Chip Stratton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] OM-4Ti "PASSED" Sticker trivia. A minor mystery., DBellamy2k |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] another philosophical question about the 135, C.H.Ling |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] another philosophical question about the 135, C.H.Ling |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |