Subject: | RE: [OM] another philosophical question about the 135 |
---|---|
From: | "O.C" <oben@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 27 Jul 2001 10:08:07 +1000 |
>It's good to hear so many good things about both lenses. I would >definitely *need* highest contrast and resolution as I am photographing >arch. Details, and if the 2.8 is just as small, then why not spend the >extra $, right? Isn't that how a true zuikoholic would justify it? > No, no, no - a true Zuikoholic would say "I have to have BOTH to be definitve>>>>>> Barry H A true Zuikoholic would do as I did... go and buy a Zuiko 100mm f2...... OC < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OT crappie, Craig Henrikson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OT crappie, Craig Henrikson |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] another philosophical question about the 135, bhinderks |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] another philosophical question about the 135, C.H.Ling |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |