Group,
Should we have a mass-mailing to Cameta asking if this is the
same lens they said was Mint- and sold to a person in Australia who
then had to return it because of the huge amount of Fungus in it and
took a hefty shipping charge loss in the process?
I'm serious -- maybe something like that en-mass
from our group would scare the p*ss out of Cameta.
At least for a little while.
Mark Hammons
> BEWARE!!!
>
> I checked the photocopied reciept of the 'fungus farm' 50 f1.2 that I
> bought off and subsequently returned to Cameta on the 14/5/2001. THIS IS
> THE SAME LENS, obviously has probably been cleaned but I had it looked at
> professionally and the verdict was that the fungus removal had a high
> likelihood of damaging or removing the coating entirely.
>
> They've knocked $20 off the price I had paid... not a good sign.
>
> Caveat Emptor.
>
> Oben
>
> At 01:21 PM Tuesday 24/07/2001, George wrote:
> >Olympus Zuiko Auto-S 50mmf1.2 Ser.#104642-Later Multicoated Version(Mint-)
> >$279.
> >
> >Cameta new arrivals.
> >
> ><http://www.cameta.com>http://www.cameta.com
> >
> >No connection.
> >
> >GeoW
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|