Re: [OM] A 100mm f2

[Tris Schuler]

Exactly so. If you're happy with the results you get from what you have, 
why worry about something else out there that someone you don't know claims 
is "better"? On the other hand, while curiosity killed the cat it isn't 
always a bad thing for photographers. Though it can get to be somewhat 
expensive when it comes to glass. <g>
Tris


At 05:27 PM 7/22/01 -0400, you wrote:
> In a message dated 7/22/01 10:31:26 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> tristanjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>
> > For that matter, maybe I just happen to have a exceptionally good f2.8.
>
> I have a 28/2.8.  I have recently done some architectural photos of homes
> with vinyl siding installations on Gold 200.  The full frame negatives were
> enlarged to 11 x 14 at a local pro lab.  The results are great!  While I
> haven't used a 28/2 I don't think I would spend the money to get one to
> replace the 28/2.8.
>
> Dave Dougherty