Subject: | Re: [OM] A 100mm f2 |
---|---|
From: | DAVDOU9211@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Sun, 22 Jul 2001 17:27:47 EDT |
In a message dated 7/22/01 10:31:26 AM Pacific Daylight Time, tristanjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > For that matter, maybe I just happen to have a exceptionally good f2.8. > > I have a 28/2.8. I have recently done some architectural photos of homes with vinyl siding installations on Gold 200. The full frame negatives were enlarged to 11 x 14 at a local pro lab. The results are great! While I haven't used a 28/2 I don't think I would spend the money to get one to replace the 28/2.8. Dave Dougherty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Larger view of my TOPE 6 entry, W. J. Liles |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] OM 4 w/4T electronics BIN $300, NSURIT |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] A 100mm f2, Gary Reese |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] A 100mm f2, Tris Schuler |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |