Subject: | Re: [OM] A 100mm f2 |
---|---|
From: | Gary Reese <pcacala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 22 Jul 2001 13:40:50 -0700 |
Henrik asks: << Why is the f2 better than the f2.8, except for the 2/3 step (or whatever it is) in light? >> Depends on a person's concept of "better." The f/2 has ED glass and focuses closer, among other traits. Maybe that is better to one person than another. Gary Reese Las Vegas, NV < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Fireworks, Henrik Dahl |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] eBay 50mm f1.2 BIN, Jim Brokaw |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] A 100mm f2, MauriceMahler |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] A 100mm f2, DAVDOU9211 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |