I don't really remember. It's Fuji that I bought at the WalMart. Either 100
or 400. Pretty sure it was 100.
Tom
> That is a remarkable photo. The resolution by the scanner is made obvious
by
> the crispness of the shooting lens. Couldn't you get just a little more
> resolution so I can read the dates on the pennies? ;-)What film is it?
>
> -Mickey
> > 90/2 Macro.
> >
> > Guess I am an enabler. I did like this shot, though. Right on the
> > Riverwalk in San Antonio.
> >
> > That is one thing about 4000dpi that I failed to mention. Even when you
> > resize them, the detail just jumps out at you.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > From: "Bolty" <boldbolty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> > > WHOA!! It's so sharp it's three dimensional!! What lens was this taken
> > with?
> > >
> > > > Here's another big scan
> > > >
> > > > http://www.zuikoholic.com/g11-4t-05.tmp
> > > >
> > > > Here's the smaller version on the website to look at to see if you
> want
> > to
> > > > download the larger one.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.scales.tzo.com/35mm/flowers/images/g11-4t-05.jpg
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tom
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
