At 04:18 1/18/01, Albert Yang wrote:
http://www.achtung.com/images/om-1/
Be that as it may, I took a few shots of roughly the same building
(City hall of the city of Pasadena) with my Tokina 90mm, and then my
Zuiko 50mm f/1.8, and 28mm f/2.8.
[snip]
I would love your comments! Thanks! I personally think the pictures
I have in hand look better than the scanned ones, but that's life...
My originals always look better than even super hi-res PhotoCD scans
downsized for web use. Regardless of what you do, a computer monitor will
not display the detail, nor can any affordable scanner capture the dynamic
range of contrast present in the original.
Excellent that you explored the subject from different perspectives using
different focal lengths! Assuming you live near there, you might try
shooting it again at different times of day (on a clear, sunny day) to
observe how the quality of light and shadows change between morning,
mid-day and afternoon/evening. Then find the few that look best to you,
compare them to the others, and make notes about what you did, and why one
looks better, or is more interesting than another (such as the direction of
the light or how you composed it).
Keep shooting!
-- John
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|