Dear Albert:
Would you mind explaining why you set teh superia film to ASA 320 even if it
is nominally an ASA 400? That would be in effect adding mroe exposure like a
backlight compensation. Does the film give better pictures this way?
Regards
Titoy
----- Original Message -----
From: Albert Yang <albert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 12:18 PM
Subject: [OM] My pictures
> http://www.achtung.com/images/om-1/
>
> Well, I took some pictures, and I scanned a few in. The matte paper
> gave good images but didn't scan in as well as the shiny stuff.
> Also, depending on how your monitor and computer is setup, I've
> notice drastic differences in the quality of color...
>
> Be that as it may, I took a few shots of roughly the same building
> (City hall of the city of Pasadena) with my Tokina 90mm, and then my
> Zuiko 50mm f/1.8, and 28mm f/2.8.
>
> I think the Tokina is fast becoming my favorite lens! The 28mm is
> less sharp than the 50mm.. The 50 is razor sharp, and the 90mm is
> awesome. I'm very happy with the lenses, and the camera.
>
> All pictures are taken on Superia 400, set to 320. f/8 on all the
> shots...
>
> I would love your comments! Thanks! I personally think the pictures
> I have in hand look better than the scanned ones, but that's life...
>
> Albert
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|