>> Andrew Fildes asks if they (50mm 1.8) have any uses
>
>But to get to the point. The 1.8 was better than the 1.4 at every stop
>beyond 4.0 and was nearly the equal of the 3.5 macro. Do I have a pair of
>crappy lenses in the 1.4 and the macro? Not unless every other Zuiko I
>have is similarly crappy. Is my 1.8 better than average? I don?t have a
>clue, but I do have a lot more respect for it now and actually use it every
>once in a while. Don?t diss this lens too quickly.
>Walt Wayman
>
My point entirely Walt. We must rescue this lens in any way we can.
Incidently, to me 'diss' means to break up or throw away - comes from the
printing trade where it was short for 'distribute' - to break up a piece of
typesetting and redistribute the type to its cases. Elegant, or what?!
Andrew
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|