Subject: | Re: [OM] second body |
---|---|
From: | T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: | Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:54:39 +0000 (UTC) |
Well, Ken does have a point - I would like to second that. I wouldn't trade my 2s/p's for even a truckload of OM3Ti's.... Once one has learned to use the unique features of the OM2s/p (such as the continius spot-metering in manual mode WITHOUT a need to fumble to hit a spot-button), there is no turning back ;) I think the list knows how I feel towards the OM2s/p - but it is just time to counter the bashing to maintain balance ;) --thomas (who wouldn't mind 2-3 more 2s/p's...) On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Jim Couch wrote: > Boy Ken you must feel very strongly about this. Your message came > through 3 or 4 times! > > :) > > Jim Couch > > Ken Norton wrote: > > > Second body? Does Pamela Anderson count? > > > > I've been sitting quietly reading the digest (throwing > > pens at the screen) as people continue to trash the > > OM-2S... > > > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > > > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] To trade, or not to trade... That is the question!, Winsor Crosby |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] second body, Motor Sport Visions Photography |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] second body, Jim Couch |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Second body, Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |