I'm wearing a 1962 Omega Seamaster which I love despite its idiosyncracies
- automatic but otherwise utterly traditional. My point is that a ten
dollar digital watch is more accurate than the most expensive mechanical
watch (analogue - ugh!) ever made. But accuracy was not enough. Nowadays,
around me, children wear flashy, throwaway digitals and serious people buy
'name' mechanicals. Very noticeable in a school.
Andrew
>Yes, but how many of you wearing quartz watch with analogue display
>and how many wear the automatic one? If digital can give film quality
>will you go back to shoot film?
>
>C.H.Ling
>
>Andrew Fildes wrote:
>
>>
>> Remember when everyone HAD to have a digital watch? There is always a
>> tendency to return to basics once we finish playing.
>> Andrew
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|