Let's see, compared to the 50/1.8 the 40/2 is 7mm shorter in length.
The 40/2 focuses to 0.3m, compared to 0.23m for the 50/3.5 macro, not
too shabby. I have noticed that the lens hood for the 40/2 also goes on
the 85/2 and 100/2.8. what's the difference between the hood that says
85/2 100/2.8 and the one that says 40/2 85/2 100/2.8. I assume they
are interchangeable?
/wayne
At 09:02 PM 9/28/2000 -0500, Franklin A. Berryman wrote:
>I know this is probably heresy, but does anyone think the 40mm is
>simply to small?
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|