Definately no need to keep throwing around rediculous prices that only the
wealthy can afford. Who has $535 for a 40mm lens? It just keeps the market
prices up, and keeps the belief that this is what "should" be paid.
Larry
"Franklin A. Berryman" wrote:
> Hokey-smokes, Bullwinkle, that's more expensive than 140 grams of
> upsy-daysium!
>
> Tom Scales wrote:
>
> > Well, I think it is new in box. I'd guess $535.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > > The mythical Zuiko 40mm f2.0 lens has surfaced on eBAY. Anybody want to
> > make
> > > an educated guess as to what it will go for?
> > >
> > >
> > > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> > >
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|