Subject: | Re: [OM] Aftermarket Super Wide and 500mm mirror |
---|---|
From: | "Lex Jenkins" <lexjenkins@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 21 Jul 2000 20:08:26 GMT |
Yup, you're right, it was the 18/3.5. What impressed me about the L glass
was the total absence of apparent distortion through the viewfinder, and the
fellow at the counter said the Zuiko was just as good. I was already in
shock and afraid I might drop another sample, so I declined to handle it.
;)
==================================================== From: "John A. Lind" <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxx> At 04:45 7/21/00 , Lex Jenkins wrote: >>Unfortunately I recently peered through a Canon "L" series ultra-WA and am>suffering from aftershock. I declined to try the store's 19mm Zuiko for>fear of a relapse. I'll have to wait a while for my expectations to settle>to an affordable level. >----------- >Lex JenkinsI think the Zuiko you intended is the 18mm f/3.5 and it is a very fine lens.It *is* easy to make perspective lines very unnatural looking with it. I haven't noted any "distortion" (pincushion, barrel, etc.), and Gary Reese's lens testing of two samples also mentions a lack of distortion. ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] Aftermarket Super Wide and 500mm mirror, Lex Jenkins |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [OM] Aftermarket Super Wide and 500mm mirror, johncw |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] Aftermarket Super Wide and 500mm mirror, Lex Jenkins |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] Aftermarket Super Wide and 500mm mirror, johncw |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |