Subject: | Re: [OM] Dings, Doinks and Dents |
---|---|
From: | Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 15 Jun 2000 00:03:54 -0700 |
> >A friend recently showed me what happens when you do that to a Canon28-205 IS Zoom. $500+ dollars, down the drain -- the lens literally broke in half!<I assume he was talking about the Canon 28-135mm F3.5-5.6 IS USM. No, I distinctly remember seeing 28 to 200-something on the rear-half of the lens (the half in her RIGHT hand... :-) It might not have been exactly 205 on the high end. I looked around a bit for the aperture, but it wasn't prominently displayed on the lens. To one used to seeing a lot of beat-up looking, but basically integral lenses (my collection :-), I'll tell you -- seeing a lens in two halves was a shocking sight! -- : Jan Steinman <mailto:Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : Bytesmiths <http://www.bytesmiths.com> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Photodo lens sharpness ratings, Jan Steinman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Night shooting on Auto - OM-4T, John A. Lind |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Dings, Doinks and Dents, Sean Chan |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Dings, Doinks and Dents, Lex Jenkins |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |