Subject: | Re: [OM] Dings, Doinks and Dents |
---|---|
From: | "Lex Jenkins" <lexjenkins@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 14 Jun 2000 18:21:06 PDT |
Jan Steinman: A friend recently showed me what happens when you do that to a Canon 28-205 IS Zoom. $500+ dollars, down the drain -- the lens literally broke in half!<That's one thing hindering me from investing in AF gear. Unless I could afford Canon's L-series glass there didn't seem to be any point. The L-glass is shrouded in tanklike armor that can take a licking. Everything else in the Canon line, as well as Sigma's, et al, seem pretty fragile by comparison. Heck, even Olympus's failed AF system included lenses that were built like they were intended to stop bullets. I've been tempted to try an OM-77 or -88 just on the basis of the lenses alone. Lex ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Object of beauty, Lex Jenkins |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Re: lens too sharp?, Garth Wood |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Dings, Doinks and Dents, RobBurn |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Dings, Doinks and Dents, Sean Chan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |