You know, I'd forgotten about that. I'll probably still carry the 40 then.
I own both the 35/2 and the 35/2.8, so I do have choices.
Tom
> Tom wrote:
>
> > The 40 will probably get replaced with the 35/2.8 shift when
> > it arrives,
> > just for the flexibility (although its big).
> >
>
> There is no comparison between these lenses - I wouldn't even think of
using
> the shift without a tripod - remember you need to stop it down *manually*.
> If you want a 35mm for just wandering around, get an f2.8 - the price (in
> comparison to the shift) is not an issue.
>
> Wayne Harridge
> Ivanhoe, Victoria, Australia
> http://www.geocities.com/wayneharridge/
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|