In a message dated 00-05-09 01:40:12 EDT, you write:
> Is the extra 8 degrees of coverage and the little bit of extra
> weight worth spending a few hundred dollars more? Which of these
> lenses, if you have both, is your favorite?
I have the 16/3.5, 18/3.5. 21/3.5, 24/2.8, 28/2 and 28/3.5. Of all of these
the 16 and 21 are my favorites. The 21 is great for near/far landscapes--you
can get a near macro close image (not really) in focus with distant mountains
at f 16.
Warren
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|