JS wrote:
>
> The fact that Olympus had very low light in the bag that far
> back,and then
> let it go by the wayside and nobody else has has permanently
> incorporated it into their own systems just doesn't seem to make
> sense.Especially with the high end equipment today!Seems
> there should be a
> demand for it don't you think?
>
Interesting comment. I was looking at an exhibition of photographs a week
ago, they were from school students and "serious" amateurs, there were
probably about 150 prints in total and I don't think *one* was a low light
shot. The question is: Are most people not interested in low light/night
shots or do they not attempt it because of the limitations of their
equipment ?
Wayne Harridge
Ivanhoe, Victoria, Australia
http://www.geocities.com/wayneharridge/
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|