Rand,
Help me with this if you would. I was under the impression that the -2n
went way way long on exposure times, and that the -2 didn't. Is this
backwards?
Thanks,
Dave
>
> John,
> Myself and no doubt many others on this list refuse to
> part with our
> OM2 for the simple reason that they are very capable of very long
> exposures. I have taken well exposed (for the conditions) in the
> vicinity of 17 minutes. Don't you find it odd that they limited the
> long exposure on the OM2n to two minutes yet they rate it as having a
> better EV value than the OM2 ? I wonder what the real EV
> rating on the
> OM2 really is ?
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|