Subject: | Re: [OM] Re: Flash for OM-1 (was "???") |
---|---|
From: | GMcGrath@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Sun, 27 Feb 2000 18:34:07 EST |
wright@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes: << I never understood the reason that OM shoes were detachable in the first place. >> Seems like I read somewhere that Mr. Maitani or someone else at Olympus thought that the cameras looked better with the naked prism housing, so they made the flash shoe detachable. Greg < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] For John Hermanson - Replacing rear element on 24mm F2, Christopher Biggs |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Thanks, Mark Staiger |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re: Flash for OM-1 (was "???"), John Robison |
Next by Thread: | [OM] problems using winder 2, stephen ireland |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |