Subject: | Re: [OM] 300/4.5 |
---|---|
From: | Clyde Soles <csoles@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 17 Dec 1999 14:41:57 -0700 |
Slightly off topic...Are the 250 and 350 really the exact same
diameter and weight as the handbook and SIF claim?
btw there's a black 350 on ebay now...somebody could have a *very* merry Christmas! Here is how the glass of the 350/2.8 is described:"The provision of two lens elements of special low dispersion glass, and another of extraordinary partial dispersion glass successfully cuts chromatic aberrationsto virtual insignificant proportions." Special Low Dispersion - SD, and again, Extraordinary Partial Dispersion. The 250/2: "Chromatic aberrations are completely corrected by the use of special lowdispersion glass, and extraordinary partial dispersion glass for each of the fourfront elements." There's a bit more glass discussion in the glossary too but it doesn't add much to the conversation except lumping all the exotics under "ultra low dispersion glass." < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Ponderings about Full Synchro Flash, Emil Pozar |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [OM] OHP FWD>the future of Olympus OM system 35mm SLR? -Reply -Reply, Scott Nelson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 300/4.5, Clyde Soles |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 300/4.5, george |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |