ML Archiv: Re: [OM] lenses -Reply

Subject:	Re: [OM] lenses -Reply
From:	sje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:	Thu, 30 Sep 1999 11:27:48 +0000

Doris wrote:

>28 vs. 24 ? Buy both, you won't regret it. 
>
>                                  *= Doris Fang =*
>                                  Zuiko Consultant

Zuiko SALES consultant, more like  ;-)  

Good advice all the same.  If you can't afford both get the 24mm.  I have a
24/2.8 and don't find the distortion a problem.

Simon E.


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] lenses, (continued) Re: [OM] lenses, John Hudson Re: [OM] lenses, Barry B. Bean Re: [OM] lenses, Gary Edwards Re: [OM] lenses, Glen Lowry Sv: [OM] lenses, LARS BUNDESEN [OM] lenses -Reply, Scott Nelson Re: [OM] lenses -Reply, - DORIS FANG - Re: [OM] lenses, imagineero . Re: [OM] lenses, Richard Ross RE: [OM] lenses, Olaf Greve Re: [OM] lenses -Reply, sje <= Re: [OM] lenses -Reply, Gary Edwards Re: [OM] lenses -Reply, - DORIS FANG - Re: [OM] lenses, claire

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] British Olympus Club, Frank van Lindert
Next by Date:	[OM] ADITL2, Olaf Greve
Previous by Thread:	RE: [OM] lenses, Olaf Greve
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] lenses -Reply, Gary Edwards
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]