The Zuiko 24/2.0 has been one of my favourites for years. Great for indoors
and/or low light situations. But avoid having faces in the edges of the
pictures, if possible.
The 24/2.8 is also a very fine lens, I think.
Lars Bundesen
----------
> Fra: Keith (R.K.) Berry <keith_r.k.berry@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Til: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Emne: Re: [OM] lenses
> Dato: 29. september 1999 19:10
>
>
> Joey Richards wrote
> >...I've heard that below about 28mm, significant distortion tends to
occur
> >around image edges. Is this something that is really a problem? I'd
> >like to get as wide as possible, but I don't want to end up limiting
> >myself because everything looks funny through the 24mm lens...
>
> I thought much the same ten months ago and wouldn't spend Zuiko money on
a
> 24mm. I bought for much less a Miranda (Vivitar) 24mm f2.8 and have been
> delighted with the results from this focal length. Distortion is much
less
> obvious in the final picture than it seems in the viewfinder (you can get
> so-o-o much more in the frame), and NOW I'd like to replace it with a
real
> Zuiko.
>
> Regards,
> Keith Berry (Birmingham, England)
> keith_r.k.berry@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://homepages.which.net/~k.berry
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|