Hi,
As I read (drooling) what Jan takes around in his fanny pack, I'd like to
add that the 100/2 is a very fine lens, with better performance on F2 and
F2.8 that the 90 mm macro (but only having semi-macro facilities).
Also, older lenses like the 28/2.0 and the 55 mm/1.2 are very, very good.
A couple of years ago one of the German magazines tested wide angles, and
the Zuiko 28/2.0 was equal to or better than much newer lenses, so even if
this lens was designed more than 25 years ago, it is still as good as
anything else, except perhaps Leitz'. (I don't remember all details of this
test right now).
Lars
----------
> Fra: Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Til: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Emne: [OM] a few questions
> Dato: 26. september 1999 20:49
>
> >From: "imagineero ." <imagineero@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >Hey guys, I am new to the list and just thought I might put my few
questions
> >in for fun...
>
> Welcome! Are you sure you meet all the requirements for list
> membership? You must either 1) own an SUV, 2) want to ban SUVs, 3)
> want to ban those who discuss SUVs, or 4) are outside the US, and
> wonder what an SUV is. (If this doesn't make sense, look at the past
> couple weeks' of archives. Suffice to say this list is high-volume,
> and tends to get off-topic easily. :-)
>
> >Does the om4 have Depth of field preview?
>
> For all the OM series cameras, the DOF preview is on the lens,
> conveniently located under a fingertip if you cradle the lens in your
> left hand. This is often criticized by users of other cameras, but is
> a Feature, not a Bug, IMHO!
>
> >Does it hace a PC synch socket?
>
> Yes, in addition to a five-pin socket for TTL flash and a seven-pin
> hot-shoe (OM-4T only) that connects with the "sync-at-any-speed"
> F-280 flash. The Olympus T-series flashes can be ganged for simple,
> TTL automatic multi-flash. Unfortunately, you cannot change the
> ratios between the flashes, except with distance, ND filters, or type
> (using a T-32 with a T-20 hair-light, for example.)
>
> >Is there a back available that will imprint shooting data (apperture &
> >shutter). The recordback4 can't do this, right?
>
> The information, as far as I know, is not available to the back.
> Metering on all the OM bodies is "relative," rather than "absolute."
> The camera body has no idea what f-stop a lens is set to. The
> aperture coupling lever only tells the body, "At exposure time,
> you'll be getting n stops less light than you're getting right now."
>
> Of course, the camera body knows its shutter speed, but I do not
> think that information is passed to the back.
>
> Remember, this is a 20-year-old design. Microprocessors were exotic
> lab experiments then. The lack of electrical complication is an
> advantage, IMHO, reflected in greater reliability, at the expense of
> somewhat less sophistication.
>
> >Among the zuiko lenses, which are considered to be the real 'shiners'?
> >Which lenses would you not go without?
>
> Oh boy, you're opening a whole discussion thread! (Be sure to inquire
> about the differences between single- and multi-coated lenses, a
> subject as near and dear to our hearts as SUVs! :-)
>
> There are several web sites devoted to OM lenses. Be sure to check
> out Paul Farrar's for basic operational data and recent dealer
> prices, and Gary Reese's for lens test data. These and other OM links
> can be reached from the list web-site, URL of which should be at the
> end of this message.
>
> I think it's generally regarded that the fast teles (350/2.8, 250/2,
> 180/2) are world-class, with prices to match. These are so good that
> they are hard to find at any price, as Leica (et. al.) owners are
> buying them and converting them to their mounts.
>
> Also world-class is much of the macro gear (90/2, 50/2, 50/3.5). Most
> agree that the OM macro system is unmatched, with over a dozen lenses
> available, covering reproduction ratios to 16:1, and some truly
> unique items, such as the telescoping auto-extension tube and a
> component, muliti-head TTL auto macro flash system.
>
> The fast wides, with a few exceptions (24, 21), are better than the
> slower wides, unlike other camera systems, where speed generally
> equals compromise.
>
> Finally, a few relative "bargain" lenses really shine, such as the
> 50/1.8, 24/2.8, and the 21/3.5.
>
> What would I not be without? I'm fickle, and go through phases,
> falling in love with a lens for a while, then putting it on the shelf
> to explore another for a while.
>
> I generally carry as much as I can stuff into a Lowe-Pro Orion waist
> pack (that's a fanny pack to those outside of Australia :-). This
> currently has: 90/2, 35/2.8 shift, 24/3.5 shift, 21/2, and the 16/3.5
> fisheye. I'd guess the 90/2 is my all-around favorite, although I'm
> unhappy with its size and weight.
>
> >...Can anyone share experiences
> >they've had with the om4?
>
> Perhaps the most important thing to know for a prospective OM-4 buyer
> is that there are two versions. The plain OM-4 is only available
> used, and has one-quarter the battery life of the newer OM-4T, which
> also is more reliable and takes the F-280 fast-synch flash.
>
> If you get into the OM system, be sure to bring an open mind. Some of
> its best-loved ergonomic features (locations of DOF preview, shutter
> speed and lens controls) are despised by those who are used to
> "thinking inside the box" of another camera system.
>
> Again, welcome! I'd recommend either subscribing to the digest, or
> getting familiar with your email program's kill facility, due to the
> list's high traffic and frequent (but generally entertaining)
> diversions.
>
> : Jan Steinman <mailto:Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> : Bytesmiths <http://www.bytesmiths.com>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|