From: Acer Victoria <siddim01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>From each roll, how many photos are you happy with?
You mean there's a hard and fast formula?
I typically get between 0 and 36 good shots to a roll. :-)
Seriously, I'm amazed at how much variability I experience. Part of
that is due to failed experiments. (Part of that is due to wildly
successful experiments! :-) Most of it is probably due to inspiration
-- when I'm really happy with what I'm seeing, I take more "keepers."
But I actually have some statistics. In my digital archive, I assign
between 0 and five stars as a keyword to photos that I really like. I
currently have 2283 images:
146 (6.4%) got *
144 (6.3%) got **
72 (3.2%) got ***
8 (0.35%) got ****
2 (0.088%) got *****
Note that it's not a bell-curve. I'm probably harder on my own work
than others would be.
... I feel
good if I get 3/24. The rest may be good, but there's something that could
have been better.
So I only found about 160f my shots worthy of rating. That's not
too far off from your 3/24 (13%).
But how do you define "keepers?" Of the images I've been paid for or
had published, none have as much as a single star. My ADITL shot
(which one person wrote to tell me it was her favorite!) didn't get
any stars.
One thing I've discovered in attempting an archive is that it is a
very difficult task to "rate" images. I ended up defining the meaning
of my star rating as, "Do I really like this image?" This is not the
same thing as "Would you like this image?" or "Would a panel of
distinguished photography judges like this image?" or "Would someone
pay me for this image?"
: Jan Steinman <mailto:Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
: Bytesmiths <http://www.bytesmiths.com>
: 19280 Rydman Court, West Linn, OR 97068-1331 USA
: +1 503 635 3229 (voice) +1 503 675 9012 (fax)
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|