Subject: | Re: [OM] zooms for OM camera? (a bit long) |
---|---|
From: | Joel Wilcox <jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 24 Jul 1999 21:14:56 -0500 |
At 04:27 PM 7/24/1999 -0700, George you wrote in part: >The 85-250 and 65-200 are also great lenses, while the 100-200 is good , >but not quite as good as the others. George, You have both the 85-250 and 65-200, no? What situations determine for you the use of one instead of the other? Thanks. Joel Wilcox Iowa City, Iowa USA < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Lens Choices for Travel, *- DORIS FANG -* |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [OM] Mail order film/processing - best sources?, Skip Williams |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] zooms for OM camera? (a bit long), George M. Anderson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] zooms for OM camera? (a bit long), George M. Anderson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |