Subject: | Re: [OM] zoom lens suggestion |
---|---|
From: | Joel Wilcox <jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 17 Jul 1999 11:17:00 -0500 |
At 11:12 PM 7/16/1999 -0500, you wrote: >>>> I am new to the list. I bought my OM1 in high school over 20 years ago. I have just become interested in photography again and purchased another body (OMG) along with some used Zuiko lenses: 135 f3.5; 75-150 f4 and 35 f2.8. I already had a Zuiko 50 f1.8 and 28 f3.5 along with a Quantrary 80-205 zoom.<<<< Steve, Welcome. Somebody a while back posted a neat URL on third-party classics: http://www.smu.edu/~rmonagha/third/cult.html There has been a lot of discussion of non-Zuiko zooms in the past. If Gary Schloss doesn't weigh in here, just search the archives for his name. What do you think is wrong with your 75-150/f4? For what I use mine for, I've always been satisfied with it (hand-held, etc.). It doesn't beat any of the other Zuiko zooms that cover much of the same range (60-200, 85-250), but to me it handles better because of its size. Mine however is a relatively new one, and they were subject to element separation. Joel Wilcox Iowa City, Iowa USA <thismessagewasdeliveredviatheolympusmailinglist> <forquestions,mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <webpage:http://zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html> |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 200/4, Joel Wilcox |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OT Zuiko MC 90 (even more OT), Joel Wilcox |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] zoom lens suggestion, Tom Trottier |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] zoom lens suggestion, Thomas Haegin |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |