Hoi Olaf,
wat betreft een prettige vervoersoptie voor je spullen: mijn vrouw en
ik zijn beide heel tevreden met een 'Orion Trekker' rugzak van
LowePro.
Bij FotoKlein in Rotterdam op dit moment f 99,- ex BTW.
Je komt een eind met de body en lenzen die je noemde bij optie 1,
de films, assesoores en evt. de flitser kunnen in het rugzakgedeelte
(bij je lunchtrommel en melk thermosfles). Ik kan verder hier wel
beschrijven hoe het verder werkt maar in de winkel is het sneller te
zien.
Verder heb ik zelf nog een Orion AW, daar kan nog wat meer in, en
hij is wat hoger (past de 65-200 misschien nog beter in), en heeft
de rugzak als optie, je klikt die er als het ware bovenop (normaal
ziet ie in opgevouwen toestand voor op de cameratas). Nadeel: hij
is 2,5x duurder. Ik weet niet of ik hem nu nogmaals zou kopen
(nadien kwam die trekker pas op de markt).
Oh ja, en het dievengilde weet heeeeeel goed waar LowePro vrij
populair mee is, ben ik bang.
Succes met je keuze.
Groetjes,
Frank.
From: Olaf Greve <Ogreve@xxxxxxx>
To: "'olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [OM] Equipment case
Date sent: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 14:54:58 +0200
Send reply to: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi,
>
> A while ago I noticed a discussion in this group about the different kind of
> equipment cases/backpacks people use to carry their gear around.
>
> Unfortunately at that time I didn't manage to find the 25th hour in the day
> to follow that thread closely, but in one week from now I'll have my
> birthday (June 7th) and I'm thinking of asking (money) for a decent bag.
>
> Roughly, the following is what I'm looking for:
> -Enough space to store either of the following options:
> Option 1: OM-4Ti (incl. databack 4), 35-70/4, 65-200/4, 24/2.8, 35/2.8
> shift, 1 or 2 filters, up to 6 rolls of film.
> Option 2: Same as option 1, plus: small (light!) tripod, cable release,
> F280.
> Option 3: Same as option 2, plus: 300/4.5, OM-40.
> Option 4: Same as option 3, plus space for gear not yet acquired, like e.g.
> 500/8 reflex, macro gear.
> -Low profile bag, i.e. preferrably it should be cloaked so it won't attract
> potential thieves' attention too quickly, in other words, I'd prefer it not
> to have any camera brand names on it.
> -Easily accessible and/or comfortable to carry around (what are opinions on
> backpacks vs. shoulderbags?).
> -Comfortable and durable material, which protects the gear really well.
> -Preferrably lightweight.
> -Preferrably economically priced.
>
> Now, I know some of the above "requirements" are more or less mutually
> exclusive, so I'm looking for a best-of-all-worlds solution. It's not much
> of an issue if not all of the above requirements are met, although I'd
> really like the bag to be able to contain at least the gear of option 1. Of
> course it would be very interesting to see some suggestions for all the 3
> above mentioned options. Also, if people feel this to be off-topic or
> already gone over in detail, I would be interested in seeing some of the
> posts of the original thread off-list.
>
> Finally, I remember having seen the Lowepro brand being mentioned quite
> often, is this the preferred brand?
>
> Thanks for your time,
> Olaf
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|