<snip earlier discussion of whether or not the contest shld be annymous>
to which Sean Mattingly intervened:
> Sorry, just had to jump in here...
>
> In reply to the question, "What's the point of winning if no one knows
>who you are," I would like to ask, what's the point of winning?
>
> It seems to me to be more interesting to choose a theme (or not) and
>have people send in contributions which people can comment on. Voting
>is like a democracy...is art a democratic process?
>
> I like the idea of a periodic collection of photos...but making it a
>contest seems unnecessary.
>
I second this notion. While I really like the idea of having a photo-day
and think that feedback might be an interesting and useful part of this
event, I don't see the need to compete.
Is it that the Olympian spirit is absorbed through contact with our
favourite weapons/tools/toys (you pick the proper term)? If this is the
case and our webbed polis votes to go ahead with a competition, then in the
spirit of the venerable Olympic tradition and Greek forebears, I suggest
that we adopt a rule stipulating that all photos submitted be shot by naked
competitors.
Glen Lowry
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|