George wrote:
>
> << >* One per month may be too much to handle at first, logistically.
> >Someone said once a quarter, I would even go for every other month.
>
> Ditto. It's better to leave us all with wanting more than start
> off too ambitious and everyone wanes off. Every other month sounds
> good--not too quick or slow. If there is demand enough and
> enthusiasm, we
> can make it monthly.
> >>
This sounds sensible.
>
> How about we have a goal of ONE first, without
> promising another in a
> month or two months, etc, to see if whoever does it really
> has enough time,
> space, etc.
> This way, we could see how it went and then plan how
> often we want
> it, or how often is feasible. It may take a whole month to
> shoot, process,
> scan, send, post, vote, etc, etc, (at least for the first
> month we could
> expect it to run longer as we feel our way around how to do it, no?).
>
I hadn't really intended it to be a competition when I initially suggested
it, but if people want to run with that, I don't mind. Only thing with a
competition is that it requires a bit more "management" by whoever runs it.
It seems like there are enough people interested to make it worth while, at
least for a trial.
For the competition on the Contax list, how is the voting done, web site or
e-mail ?
Wayne Harridge
Ivanhoe, Victoria, Australia
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Louvre/6152/
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|