<< containing moving cars look well synchronized (if there not, it looks
> pretty obvious when viewing in stereo). >
Most humble apologies, that should have been "if they're not,...".
We'll let you off with a warning this time, sir. Speak safely out there. :op
Sgt. Dave
OM List Language Police
Apostrophe Division
>>
Memo to: Sgt. Dave
From: Sr. Investigator George S.
OM List Language Police
Parentheses Division.
Subj: Apopstrophe abuse allegations
Dear Sgt Dave;
Thank you for bringing the investigation of apostrophe abuse to
our
attention.
While we appreciate your efforts, we feel you have ended same prematurely,
with giving the offender, in effect, a slap on the wrist.
There apparently is sufficient probable cause for the investigation to
continue.
I would also demand you hand over all of your files on this matter to my
division since we are asserting that we have ultimate jurisdiction in this
case, since the apostrophe abuse you are investigating, occurred inside a
parentheses that we are investigating under staute 35:2A-1(a)(1) -unauthorized
use of parenthetical punctuation, and as such would take precedence over your
investigation.
Thank you for your anticipated cooperation
George S.
Sr. Investigator
OM List Police
(office of Parentheses Prosecution)
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|