Barry,
The 200mm f4 is very easy to hand hold. It is quite light and fairly
short whereas, it's sibling the 200mm f5 seems smaller than my 135mm
f3.5 and is really small and light. You have to look at them all before
you can decide on the right one for you.
Rand E.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
>
> Is the 200/4 relatively easy to shoot sans tripod? My 80-200 is heavy
> enough that I no longer attempt to use it unless I can mount it on a
> tripod (I just got a monopod and haven't tried it yet). If the 200
> was light enough to shoot hand held, it would be a huge advantage.
>
> BBB
> -
> B.B. Bean - Have horn, will travel
> bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Peach Orchard, MO
> http://www.beancotton.com/bbbean.shtml
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|