Dave Haynie wrote:
>
>
> The other one I got recently in this range in a Zuiko 100-200mm f5,
> mainly because it was at a price I couldn't refuse ($55). In very nice,
> with a small bit of internal cleaning necessary to be in EX- shape. This
> is a Zuiko S, with the plastic aperature ring, but it seems noticably
> sharper than the Tameron, so for me, a good deal.
>
Dave;
Yes, I ecently picked up one of these as well, albeit for several moe
$$$. I agree with your assessment: it seems to be quite sharper than
'expected'. And, as Gary Reese pointed out, it loses nothing when the
Zuiko 2X is added. (Well, except for ease of focus.) I think the S on
the Zuikos stands for 'Suprisingly good'.
George
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|